[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16466449#comment-16466449
 ] 

Peter Cseh edited comment on OOZIE-2715 at 5/7/18 8:44 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------

This is already possible via the 
{{oozie.service.HadoopAccessorService.action.configurations}} property.  Check 
it's description here:
https://oozie.apache.org/docs/5.0.0/oozie-default.xml


was (Author: gezapeti):
This is already possible via the 
{{oozie.service.HadoopAccessorService.action.configurations]} property.  Check 
it's description here:
https://oozie.apache.org/docs/5.0.0/oozie-default.xml

> Provide possibility to set default values for properties of a particular 
> action type
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OOZIE-2715
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2715
>             Project: Oozie
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: action
>    Affects Versions: 4.2.0
>            Reporter: Istvan Vajnorak
>            Priority: Major
>
> When it comes to retrying an action, one can set the default values for a 
> retry on the global level, and the override can happen then on the individual 
> step's level only.
> The proposal to be able to set retry and other properties on an action type 
> basis, could allow defaulting things and help not to do repetitive work on 
> each action instance in the workflow.
> Example:
> - One has 60 shell actions and 30 java actions in a workflow.
> - One sets " oozie.launcher.yarn.resourcemanager.am.max-attempts=1" globally
> - For shell steps they don't want this to get applied, so they have to 
> suppress the retry on those steps each time
> The proposal would allow an intermediate level of override similarly like the 
> hadoop conf allows with the *-default.xml, *-site.xml and code level 
> properties override.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to