-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/67129/#review203109
-----------------------------------------------------------




core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/service/TestJMSAccessorService.java
Line 86 (original)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/67129/#comment285182>

    I removed these catch blocks, they didn't serve any purpose whatsoever.



core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/service/TestJMSAccessorService.java
Lines 142-146 (original), 127 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/67129/#comment285183>

    This was absolutely unnecessary here.



core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/test/XTestCase.java
Lines 806 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/67129/#comment285184>

    Small enhancement for JDK8.


- Peter Bacsko


On máj. 15, 2018, 12:43 du, Peter Bacsko wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/67129/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated máj. 15, 2018, 12:43 du)
> 
> 
> Review request for oozie, András Piros and Peter Cseh.
> 
> 
> Repository: oozie-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Proposed fir for OOZIE-3240.
> 
> Note that most likely this patch will also solve OOZIE-3239 (or other tests 
> that fail in this class).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/service/TestJMSAccessorService.java 
> 41241d2533bf6c3f32f0fca5d76ad5b960bff1a1 
>   core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/test/XTestCase.java 
> f471b889896e9a37a59c3b8ad1c47633eed3e0c0 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/67129/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Peter Bacsko
> 
>

Reply via email to