[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16519440#comment-16519440
]
Andras Piros commented on OOZIE-3295:
-------------------------------------
Great finding [~pbacsko]!
> Flaky test
> TestSLACalculatorMemory#testAddMultipleRestartRemoveMultipleInstrumentedCorrectly
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-3295
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3295
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: core, tests
> Reporter: Peter Bacsko
> Assignee: Peter Bacsko
> Priority: Major
>
> The test
> TestSLACalculatorMemory.testAddMultipleRestartRemoveMultipleInstrumentedCorrectly
> can fail with the following error:
> {noformat}
> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: SLA map size after update all should be
> 2. An instance of SLACalcStatus was removed expected:<2> but was:<1>
> at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:57)
> at junit.framework.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:329)
> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:78)
> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:159)
> at junit.framework.TestCase.assertEquals(TestCase.java:316)
> at
> org.apache.oozie.sla.TestSLACalculatorMemory.testAddMultipleRestartRemoveMultipleInstrumentedCorrectly(TestSLACalculatorMemory.java:1084)
> {noformat}
> The problem is the following setting:
> {noformat}
> slaRegBean1.setExpectedDuration(123);
> {noformat}
> The expected duration should not be set for such a small value (123 msecs).
> On a slow machine, SLA calculator might detect that this particular SLA has
> been missed. It must be increased to a higher value.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
