[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16646253#comment-16646253
 ] 

Andras Piros commented on OOZIE-3136:
-------------------------------------

[~pbacsko] a nice writeup, thanks! I guess to 6) we need more coverage on 
integration test side, like running two {{LocalOozie}} / {{MiniOozie}} 
instances that write logs at the same time, and then try to aggregate the maybe 
overflowing but unified logs. We could even make stress tests given a similar 
scenario.

Otherwise it really looks like a viable plan now.

> Upgrade from Log4j 1.x to 2.x
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: OOZIE-3136
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3136
>             Project: Oozie
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Attila Sasvari
>            Assignee: Julia Kinga Marton
>            Priority: Major
>
> {{5 August 2015 --The Apache Logging Services™ Project Management Committee 
> (PMC) has announced that the Log4j™ 1.x logging framework has reached its end 
> of life (EOL) and is no longer officially supported.}} 
> https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/apache_logging_services_project_announces
> We should upgrade from Log4j 1.x to 2.x . Perhaps we could use slf4j .
> Related tickets: MAPREDUCE-6983, HADOOP-12956, OOZIE-3135



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to