> On July 26, 2019, 4:05 p.m., Andras Salamon wrote:
> > core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/service/HadoopAccessorService.java
> > Lines 638 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/71168/diff/1/?file=2157981#file2157981line638>
> >
> >     The property name contains the uri scheme, so it will not be possible 
> > to list all the possible properties in the oozie-default.xml. It means that 
> > we will get lots of "Invalid configuration defined" warning messages (see 
> > OOZIE-2338).
> >     
> >     Could you modify ConfigurationService.verifyConfigurationName() just 
> > like in the OOZIE-2338 do ingore the warnings.
> 
> Denes Bodo wrote:
>     I think this kind of work is out of scope of this fix. Also number of 
> file systems which shall have custom properties are quite few so in my 
> opinion defining the options in oozie-default.xml with description will help 
> the user to set the configuration more easily.
> 
> Andras Salamon wrote:
>     OK, please open an upstream jira about this limitation, Oozie will print 
> out warnings if someone wants to set filesystem properties other then s3a and 
> link it this this jira and also to OOZIE-2338.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3546


> On July 26, 2019, 4:05 p.m., Andras Salamon wrote:
> > core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/service/HadoopAccessorService.java
> > Lines 646 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/71168/diff/1/?file=2157981#file2157981line646>
> >
> >     What if a property value contains ","? This solution does not allow 
> > that. I'm not familiar with the fs properties. Can we safely assume that 
> > there is no , is the values?
> 
> Denes Bodo wrote:
>     This is documented now, we will not allow to use comma in property values 
> nor in property names.
> 
> Andras Salamon wrote:
>     OK, we can live with this limitation now. Could you please also add a 
> sentence to the oozie-default.xml description that we don't allow commas in 
> the property values. 
>     Also please open a new upstream jira which will fix that (no need to 
> solve the jira in foreseable future but show that we plan to do that).

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3547


- Denes


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71168/#review216891
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 1, 2019, 8:09 a.m., Denes Bodo wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/71168/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 1, 2019, 8:09 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for oozie and Andras Salamon.
> 
> 
> Bugs: OOZIE-3529
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3529
> 
> 
> Repository: oozie-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Many customer who uses s3 file system as secondary one experiences 
> "UnsupportedOperationException: Accessing local file system is not allowed" 
> error when Oozie tries to submit the Yarn application.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/pom.xml d2a211a89 
>   core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/service/HadoopAccessorService.java 
> 0b53a3611 
>   core/src/main/resources/oozie-default.xml f33c7b938 
>   core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/service/TestHadoopAccessorService.java 
> 89ce18550 
>   core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/test/XFsTestCase.java c0f3c6959 
>   docs/src/site/markdown/AG_HadoopConfiguration.md ab71d7cb6 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71168/diff/3/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Denes Bodo
> 
>

Reply via email to