[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16952750#comment-16952750
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on OOZIE-3542:
--------------------------------------------------------

Commit 9620d5174da89ffbc24335188c2ba06c80bf9da8 in oozie's branch 
refs/heads/master from Kinga Marton
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=oozie.git;h=9620d51 ]

OOZIE-3542 amend Handle better old Hdfs implementations in ECPolicyDisabler 
(zsombor via kmarton)


> Handle better old Hdfs implementations in ECPolicyDisabler
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OOZIE-3542
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3542
>             Project: Oozie
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: tools
>            Reporter: Zsombor Gegesy
>            Assignee: Zsombor Gegesy
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 5.2.0
>
>         Attachments: OOZIE-3542-2.patch, OOZIE-3542-3.patch, 
> OOZIE-3542-4.patch, OOZIE-3542-amend-01.patch, OOZIE-3542-amend-02.patch
>
>
> Currently, ECPolicyDisabler checks if the local hdfs implementation has the 
> necessary methods to get and set erasure coding policy. However, if the 
> namenode implementation is old, it could throw a 
> org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException with 
> RpcErrorCodeProto.ERROR_NO_SUCH_METHOD value in it.
> In this case, ECPolicyDisabler fails, and prevents the installation to 
> succeed.
> This case should be handled just like, when erasure coding is not supported.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to