I can present at 9/1 one hour in 2~6 PM at UTC+8.

Suyan <[email protected]> 于2023年8月24日周四 11:09写道:
>
> All of these time slots are ok for me.
>
> Sincerely,
> Suyan
>
> Xuanwo <[email protected]> 于2023年8月23日周三 14:14写道:
> >
> > We didn't hold the meeting because no one replied to this email. Let's 
> > schedule a new time for the testing meeting. Please respond to this email 
> > with your availability so that we can have an idea of how many people will 
> > attend in advance.
> >
> > In this meeting, we will simply greet each other. All relevant information 
> > will be shared via the mailing list, so there is no need to worry about 
> > missing any updates regarding the event.
> >
> > There are some possible time to pick up:
> >
> > - 8/31 (Thu) 10~11 AM at UTC+8
> > - 8/31 (Thu) one hour in 2~6 PM at UTC+8
> > - 9/1 (Fri) one hour in 2~6 PM at UTC+8
> >
> > For time zone convert: https://time.is/compare
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023, at 18:32, Xuanwo wrote:
> > > Community Over Code will happen at 8/18~8/20, maybe we can pick a time
> > > before that for test. And start a formal one after that (three weeks
> > > later).
> > >
> > > How about 8/3 (Thu) 4~5 PM at UTC+8? (That's a random time picked,
> > > welcome for better choice)
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023, at 16:17, Chojan Shang wrote:
> > >> Hello everyone!
> > >>
> > >> I am pleased to share our results with you. With the participation of
> > >> Xuanwo and Suyan, we tested Discord and Google Meet, and I'm glad to
> > >> say that they both work well, despite some minor setup issues I
> > >> encountered. They both support audio and video, allow access from a
> > >> browser, and their limitations are fully sufficient for our current
> > >> needs.
> > >>
> > >> However, there are some things worth noting. Google Meet has a larger
> > >> quota and can accommodate up to 100 people. Also, since we are
> > >> non-native English speakers, live captioning seems more important as it
> > >> will be a bridge for communication. As for recording meetings, it seems
> > >> that Google Meet requires a paid account to do so but I don't think
> > >> this will be a key factor in troubling us; at least we can try saying
> > >> hi.
> > >>
> > >> Overall, we have chosen Google Meet as our preferred option for
> > >> meetings at the moment. Next time - which may be next month - we plan
> > >> on having a relatively open test where everyone can join the meeting
> > >> together to test devices and greet the community.
> > >>
> > >> Looking forward to seeing you all soon.
> > >>
> > >> PsiACE
> > >>
> > >> On 2023/07/20 01:58:37 Xuanwo wrote:
> > >>> Hello, everyone!
> > >>>
> > >>> I believe it's worth discussing whether hosting OpenDAL Community Sync 
> > >>> on a regular basis is a good idea. While I've shared this concept with 
> > >>> individuals on [discord], I think the mailing list would be a more 
> > >>> appropriate forum for discussion.
> > >>>
> > >>> Here my current idea for this sync meeting:
> > >>>
> > >>> - Style: text or video meeting
> > >>>
> > >>> Attending, recording, and archiving text meetings is easier. However, I 
> > >>> believe that video meetings are more appealing and can help establish 
> > >>> connections between developers. The [Iceberg Community Sync] serves as 
> > >>> a good example. It's important to consider that most of the OpenDAL 
> > >>> PPMC members and committers are not native English speakers.
> > >>>
> > >>> - Time: two/three/four weeks
> > >>>
> > >>> The meeting will last at least one hour for all attendees. However, we 
> > >>> want to ensure that we do not overburden our participants. So two weeks 
> > >>> is two heavy for a small community like OpenDAL.
> > >>>
> > >>> Four weeks is too long and may coincide with the same time of the month 
> > >>> when some members of OpenDAL are unable to attend, such as during the 
> > >>> first or last week.
> > >>>
> > >>> So I perfer to have three weeks like Iceberg does.
> > >>>
> > >>> - Content
> > >>>
> > >>> From my experience with the Iceberg community, their sync meetings 
> > >>> typically include highlights since the last meeting, release updates, 
> > >>> and discussions. It appears that we can directly adopt these ideas.
> > >>>
> > >>> - Tools
> > >>>
> > >>> I feel like Google Meet is a good choice (based iceberg experience, 
> > >>> haha). But using discord seems easier for us. Maybe we need to have a 
> > >>> try first. I plan to have a private meeting with @psiace first and 
> > >>> share the feedback here.
> > >>>
> > >>> - Process
> > >>>
> > >>> All our meeting will be recorded, in english, and with AI generated 
> > >>> summary. We will share the summary with maillist, and maybe in blog 
> > >>> (I'm not sure).
> > >>>
> > >>> Please feel free to ask any additional questions. I am very excited to 
> > >>> meet with you!
> > >>>
> > >>> [discord]: 
> > >>> https://discord.com/channels/1081052318650339399/1081052319342407715/1130816807809327234
> > >>> [Iceberg Community Sync]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhvRg0oEdwU
> > >>>
> > >>> Xuanwo
> > >>>
> > >
> > > --
> > > Xuanwo
> >
> > --
> > Xuanwo



-- 
GPG public key: 4A6D297E6F74638E4D5F8E99152AC7B5F7608B26
Thanks,
Jun Ouyang

Reply via email to