I feel like it's better to have `rc.1` suffix under `dev/opendal/` since we could have multiple RCs.
On Sun, Jun 9, 2024, at 23:14, Suyan wrote: > I noticed that the directory on SVN where we are staging the release > candidate this time does not match what the release guide indicates as > something like `0.36.0-rc.1`. > The current directory is: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/opendal/0.47.0/ > > Adding the rc mark could be an extra hassle for the release manager, > should we remove the rc mark in the directory? > > Sincerely, > Suyan > > Suyan <[email protected]> 于2024年6月9日周日 15:02写道： >> >> +1 binding from suyanhanx >> >> [x] Download links are valid. >> [x] Checksums and signatures. >> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist >> [x] No unexpected binary files >> [x] All source files have ASF headers >> [x] Can compile from source on macOS(arm64) >> >> nit: Our `verify a release candidate` doc seems to be outdated on >> this. I will update it. >> >> Sincerely, >> Suyan >> >> tison <[email protected]> 于2024年6月7日周五 21:17写道： >> > >> > Hello, Apache OpenDAL Community, >> > >> > This is a call for a vote to release Apache OpenDAL version 0.47.0. >> > >> > The tag to be voted on is 0.47.0. >> > >> > The release candidate: >> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/opendal/0.47.0/ >> > >> > Keys to verify the release candidate: >> > >> > https://downloads.apache.org/opendal/KEYS >> > >> > Git tag for the release: >> > >> > https://github.com/apache/opendal/releases/tag/v0.47.0-rc.1 >> > >> > Maven staging repo: >> > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopendal-1033/ >> > >> > Pypi testing repo: >> > >> > https://test.pypi.org/project/opendal/ >> > >> > Website staged: >> > >> > https://opendal-v0-47-0-rc-1.staged.apache.org/ >> > >> > Please download, verify, and test. >> > >> > The VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours and until the necessary >> > number of votes are reached. >> > >> > [ ] +1 approve >> > [ ] +0 no opinion >> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason >> > >> > To learn more about apache opendal, please see https://opendal.apache.org/ >> > >> > Checklist for reference: >> > >> > [ ] Download links are valid. >> > [ ] Checksums and signatures. >> > [ ] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist >> > [ ] No unexpected binary files >> > [ ] All source files have ASF headers >> > [ ] Can compile from source >> > >> > Use our verify.py to assist in the verify process: >> > >> > svn co https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/opendal/0.47.0/ opendal-dev >> > cd opendal-dev >> > curl -sSL >> > https://github.com/apache/opendal/raw/v0.47.0-rc.1/scripts/verify.py -o >> > verify.py >> > python verify.py >> > >> > Best, >> > tison. -- Xuanwo
