GitHub user erickguan added a comment to the discussion: discuss: OpenDAL VISION Polish to "One Layer, All Storage."
>From my first read, I feel that “all storage is (somewhat) equal.” Of course, >different backend support varies in reality. “First-class support” and “all storage is equal” are two different things. If I read “first-class support for file systems and object storage,” I understand these two types of storage receive relatively high priority, presumably based on their relative importance. “All storage” could mean different things to me. It could be: * Supports many services and backends * Supports a subset of all storage * Supports storage with different levels of support I also asked ChatGPT to generate a few suggestions. I prompted file system and object storage, which I don’t like, but food for thought: 1. OpenDAL: Unified Access to Object Storage and Beyond 1. OpenDAL: One Layer for All Storage—From Object to File Systems 1. OpenDAL: Your Gateway to Object and File Storage Solutions 1. OpenDAL: The Unified Layer for First-Class Object Storage and More 1. OpenDAL: One Interface, All Storage—Empowering Object and File Systems 1. OpenDAL: Seamless Integration with Object Storage and Local File Systems GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/opendal/discussions/5296#discussioncomment-11174787 ---- This is an automatically sent email for [email protected]. To unsubscribe, please send an email to: [email protected]
