GitHub user Xuanwo added a comment to the discussion: discuss: Remove `adapter::kv` and `adapter::typed_kv`
> Shall we also retain `KvLister` and `KvDeleter` ? Yes. > so, the main point here is to reduce abstraction ? My motivation is to enable further optimization and implement new features. The current `kv` design forces us to add an extra layer here. I believe we can migrate them gradually. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/opendal/discussions/5703#discussioncomment-12440297 ---- This is an automatically sent email for dev@opendal.apache.org. To unsubscribe, please send an email to: dev-unsubscr...@opendal.apache.org
