GitHub user bonsairobo created a discussion: Should there be a `Path` type for object paths?
Right now everything takes `String` and then paths get normalized and validated. I think it would be less error-prone if a `Path` type, similar to `std::path::Path`, were provided. At least for constructing paths via `Path::join`. But maybe it could be a way to be sure you have a valid `Path` but construction, rather than requiring validation of an arbitrary `String`. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/opendal/discussions/6582 ---- This is an automatically sent email for dev@opendal.apache.org. To unsubscribe, please send an email to: dev-unsubscr...@opendal.apache.org
