Cool...I saw some of the stuff in OEJB2, cleaned some of it up and put in OEJB3...in particular, the URL list...I did that a while ago ;-)
I can put the JIRAs together...and it would be cool to all take shots at the issues. You did a good job of pointing out some of the stuff we need below. Thanks, Jeff Gianny Damour wrote: > At some stage, OpenEJB2 had some clustering stuff through WADI: > * When an EJB client was interacting with a node, on the way-back of > invocations or JNDI lookups, it was provided with a list of nodes > hosting the EJB targeted by the invocations or lookups; > * EJB clients were able to fail-over to other nodes if the primary > server was down; > * WADI was able to move statefull session beans from server to server. > > This support has been removed as WADI's API was too unstable (a lot of > refactoring happened over the last months) and the implementation was > "not yet ready" for integration. I believe both of these problems are > now addressed :) > > Thanks, > Gianny > > On 17/06/2007, at 5:33 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > >> Actually the WADI site says that OpenEJB support is underway, is this >> related to what we discuss here ??? >> >> On 6/17/07, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Good pint Gianny, actually u maid me think about a new idea, can we >>> extend >>> WADI - http://incubator.apache.org/wadi/index.html - so it can play >>> as our >>> clustering infrastructure ???. Jeff comments ??? >>> >>> On 6/16/07, Gianny Damour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > >>> > On 15/06/2007, at 6:39 AM, Jeff Genender wrote: >>> > >>> > > Awesome! Your help would be very much appreciated. >>> > > >>> > > I am flushing out the API now and I can post a patch (or just >>> > > commit it) >>> > > and we can alter it as need be. >>> > > >>> > > Should we start by talking about the SPI/API and maybe just start >>> > > posting the interfaces? >>> > Hello, >>> > >>> > It would be great to start with such a SPI/API. Also, do you think >>> > that you can propose the same SPI/API for Geronimo? There is already >>> > an API there, which is sufficient for the clustering of HTTP >>> > sessions; and I suspect it now needs to be improved to support the >>> > clustering of stateful session beans. >>> > >>> > Please, fell free to post JIRAs or something somewhere with the >>> > proposed SPI/API such that we can contribute! >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Gianny >>> > >>> > >>> > > >>> > > Jeff >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks >>> - Mohammad Nour >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks >> - Mohammad Nour
