Hi Dain,
I get it now. I had not thought about creating a new
container to achieve this. I guess that should be enough in openejb.
How about in geronimo though, what would the user have to do to add a
new container? How do you specify that a particular bean in an ejb jar
should be deployed in a specific mdb container? Can you please update
the Geronimo JIRA with those steps or point me to the steps.
Thanks
Manu
On 6/18/07, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The ActiveMQ team suggest that we do not implement our own pooling
logic in OpenEJB 3 since modern resource adapters already implement
pooling, so you end up with a very inefficient double pooling system
== poor performance. We do have a instance limit per container,
which limits the number of mdb instances that can be acquired and is
effectively the max pool size.
As with all configurations in OpenEJB 3 (and 1), this configuration
is at the container level, because we have found that normal case is
users want several EJBs to have the same configuration. When a user
wants a one off configuration for an EJB, they create a container for
that single bean (very easy).
So, I think we already have what these users need.
-dain
On Jun 17, 2007, at 11:12 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
> Yeah I agree with Jacek. We can make it like the following, the
> users can
> set the pool size on the MDB container to be applied on all MDB,
> and each
> MDB can specify its own pool size request from the server which will
> override the settings of the MDB container for this MDB only, so
> the users
> are not required to specify pool size for each MDB alone which is
> tedious.
>
> On 6/17/07, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On 6/17/07, Manu George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > A few oejb users have asked me if OpenEjb provides the
>> feature
>> > to set poolsize for message driven beans at the bean level. As
>> per my
>> > understanding with the current functionality this is not possible.
>> > What some of them want is to set poolsize for some MDBs differently
>> > from other MDB's and all of them may be using the same RA to
>> connect
>> > to the message broker.
>> > It is also there in Geronimo wishlist
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3115. Should we
>> provide
>> > this functionality? Opinions,Thoughts ...
>>
>> Why not. If it helps people and we know how to accomplish it I'd
>> say go
>> for it.
>>
>> p.s. Why do you use [EMAIL PROTECTED] address? My mailbox's
>> rules
>> can catch it.
>>
>> Jacek
>>
>> --
>> Jacek Laskowski
>> http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks
> - Mohammad Nour
