Committed. If you have any DB pooling problems let me know ASAP.
-dain
On Jul 12, 2007, at 10:38 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jul 12, 2007, at 7:54 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
From my experience DBCP works extremely well as a connection pool,
but the API can use some cleanup. My favorite example is
PoolableConnectionFactory [1]. So in Cayenne we have code like this:
ObjectPool connectionPool = new GenericObjectPool(null, poolConfig);
new PoolableConnectionFactory(
factory,
connectionPool,
statementPool,
validationQuery,
defaultReadOnly ? Boolean.TRUE : Boolean.FALSE,
defaultAutoCommit,
defaultTransactionIsolation,
defaultCatalog,
null);
return connectionPool;
PoolableConnectionFactory attaches itself to the connection pool
inside constructor. Looks weird - an object is created but not
assigned to anything. Every time I stumble upon this code, I have
to doublecheck that nothing insane is going on. 9-arg constructor
is also not good.
Would be cool if new volunteers from Geronimo could refactor
things a bit ;-)
I thought about that, but there is a lot of code and extensions to
this so I don't think the API can be changed. I just created a new
BasicManagedDataSource which uses JavaBeans properties to setup the
data source. With the existing xbean-reflect code the data source
"Just Works". I'm sure the same can be said for Spring.
-dain
