> Here i manage to add "startup" but don't explicitly say only on > startup.
That clears up the confusion > Our release is going to be awesome. When is the release expected? > Hey, did you see a user created an faq wiki page that basically says > "document this", no doubt he saw one of the ones you added and took > the liberty to do the same. Very excellent! Yes , I saw that. Exciting!! > > Option 3 is comparatively the easiest and the quickest to implement , > > because I can simply update Log4jConfigUtils with the logic you > > provided in your email. Actually, I am most probably going to get rid > > of the Logger.init() , Logger.initialize() and Log4jConfigUtils, so > > that the only interaction with the Logger is through the getInstance > > and the log methods (info, error etc) > > That sound fine to me. I don't know how that code got so bulky. > You've trimmed it down some already. After this last fix it's > finally going to be lean and mean like it should be. I will start working on option 3 once my previous patch is committed. Then i can check it out and modify the Logger. > > -David > > > > -- Karan Singh Malhi
