Good idea. If you need any help, just let me know.
-dain
On Jan 5, 2008, at 6:23 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
I looked at code committed and I have another idea to add, in case
we are
going to use the Jett implementation we can detect whether there is a
jetty.xml - jetty configuration - file under our config directory -
or we
can define the path by a property - to configure the jetty server,
in case
we didn't find the jetty.xml we can have a default configuration
object to
use, or even better we can set a default configuration file and
users can
edit it on demand. I will study the code and start to do it.
On Jan 6, 2008 4:00 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Well Dain read my mind regarding the configuration property but
the new
thing is detecting the Jetty classes. I can play with the new code
and see
how it runs.
On Jan 5, 2008 12:50 PM, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Jan 3, 2008, at 12:29 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I added code to switch from the OpenEJB http server to Jetty when
the Jetty classes are available. You can also explicitly state
which http server impl will be chosen by setting the 'impl'
property
in the HttpEjbServer properties.
Let me know if you have any problems. Also, David if you have time
can you review my changes? I'm not sure it is how you wanted this
to work (I just hacked something quickly).
Cool. Mohammad had mentioned he was going to work on this[1].
Mohammad how does this compare to what you were thinking of doing?
-David
[1]
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Webservice-support-in-standalone-
OpenEJB-p14478246.html
--
Thanks
- Mohammad Nour
--
Thanks
- Mohammad Nour
