Actually OpenEJB has a gr8 feature too, which is controlling the JNDI naming pattern using Java properties.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:20 PM, Manu George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A standard way of naming will be very useful for users. Quite a lot of > users were confused with the naming schemes in EJB3. However the way > openejb prints out the JNDI name is super in our case and helps a lot > > regards > Manu > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Well, I think this is a very tough task, cause it is really related to > > AppServers impl, and how their Naming Services work and whether they > > are global or not. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Karan Malhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I would really like to see a standard way of specifying JNDI names > accross > > > app servers. > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 5:09 AM, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > FYI to all out there, we on the EJB 3.1 Expert Group have put up a > > > > Early Draft of the EJB 3.1 specification. > > > > > > > > http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/edr/jsr318/index.html > > > > > > > > The review will be open till March 30, 2008. > > > > > > > > -David > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Karan Singh Malhi > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks > > - Mohammad Nour > > > -- Thanks - Mohammad Nour
