Hi.
I'm using embedded openEJB to test some Session Beans during my build. The
project I'm working on uses toplink JPA provider, so I want to use topLink
with openEJB.
Problem:
I want to add a new Taxon:
@Entity
@Table(name = "TAXA")
public class Taxa implements Serializable, Comparable<Taxa> {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@TableGenerator(
name = "Taxa_Gen",
table = "ID_GEN",
pkColumnName = "GENERATOR_NAME",
valueColumnName = "GENERATOR_VALUE",
pkColumnValue = "Taxa_Gen")
@Id
@GeneratedValue(strategy=GenerationType.TABLE, generator="Taxa_Gen")
@Column(name = "RECORD_ID", nullable = false)
.
.
}
My unitTest basicly calls a Session Facade, the facade delegates the
em.persist(..) to an EAO (DAO):
public class Sp2kServiceBean implements Sp2kService {
@EJB
TaxaEAO taxaEAO;
@Override
public Taxa createTaxa(Long parentId, String name) {
... //Creates new Taxa
taxaEAO.create(newTaxa);
.
.
}
TaxaEAOBean looks like this:
@Stateless
public class TaxaEAOBean implements TaxaEAO {
@PersistenceContext(name="sp2k")
private EntityManager em;
@Override
public void create(Taxa taxa) {
em.persist(taxa);
/em.flush();
}
.
.
}
The problem started when I tried to add GenerationType.TABLE, the test ran
without error, but the Taxon was not added to the DB. So i tried em.flush()
in TaxaEAOBean, which resulted in the following error:
The transaction has been marked rollback only because the bean encountered a
non-application exception :javax.persistence.TransactionRequiredException :
Exception Description: No transaction is currently active
Any ideas?
Does the use of toplink with openEJB need any more configuration than
changing the provider in persistence.xml?
I also tried it with openJPA, but it doesn't seem to use the table generated
primary key.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Toplink%2BopenEJB-%3D-TransactionRequiredException-tp16348298p16348298.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
