As David J noted a week or so back, the svn root at tags/openejb-3.0 needs to contain a LICENSE and NOTICE file. This is mandatory, IMO.

The NOTICE files in generated jar files, being created using the maven- remote-resources-plugin, aren't proper. NOTICE files should only contain legally required attributions, not a transitive list of dependencies. IMO, they should be updated. However, as long as the NOTICE files also contain the required attributions, I would say this is probably a decision for the PMC.

The generated WAR file in openejb-itests-web did not contain a license/ notice file. The notice files for all itests artifacts should be reviewed. I don't have internet access, at the moment, but recall noticing a problem. Will take a look, once I'm connected again...

The file container/openejb-jee/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/jee/ oejb3/EjbLink.java has an incorrect src license header. I'll fix on trunk...

--kevan


On Apr 4, 2008, at 8:51 PM, David Blevins wrote:

All right. TCK issues were fixed last night. Joe kicked off a run early this morning and everything is running clean. I've also run the itests on standalone and a dozen versions of tomcat and everything looks good there as well. After three weeks or so, it seems we're at the finish line.

If there does turn out to be an issue with this build, I think the best game plan would be to still release this and get a 3.0.1 next week. The 3.0-beta-2 release is good but has a large number of limitations and bugs. We need to get something out to cover it up.

And now... the binaries ....!

 http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/3.0/RELEASE-NOTES.txt

 http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/3.0/

 http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/repo/

 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0/


Here's my +1

Vote will be open for 72 hours.  Happy voting!

-David


Reply via email to