Henri Gomez kirjoitti:
EclipseLink looks interesting indeed. What kind of support would it likely
need from OpenEJB?
Well it will be the JPA 2.0 RI and will be a strong requirement for
many projects, so having it in Open EJB 3.1 will be a big bonus.
For our project, it's mandatory, so to determine if we could use
OpenEJB 3.1, we need it
You didn't answer my question. Is EclipseLink working with OpenEJB 3.1
snapshots or not? Have you tested it?
What kind of changes would it potentially require to OpenEJB?
