David Blevins wrote:
>
> Another thought is that if the properties all start with "wss4j." we
> could easily sift them out of the various existing properties buckets
> and do full overriding like we do with other things. In other words
> we'd take all "wss4j." properties from the system properties, override
> them with the "wss4j." system instance properties, override them with
> the "wss4j." openejb-jar.xml properties, and override them with
> "wss4j." openejb-jar.xml properties for bean foo. We don't have a per
> bean properties bucket in the openejb-jar.xml now, but we could add one.
>
Good thinking !
I've done the work for a bean specific configuration and it works well. But
to be honest, I've no idea about how to implement the behavior you proposed.
If someone can give me inputs, I can probably have a look to implement that.
Jean-Louis
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Securing-a-webservice-tp22265166p22696987.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
