Personally, I don't thing the EJB container should default the MDB pool size to unlimited. The EJB container would be completely agnostic of the message broker configuration(maxSessions in case of ActiveMQ) and would need the throttle to be setup itself, without assuming the provider configuration. Any thoughts?
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Fredrik Jonson <fred...@myrealbox.com>wrote: > Hi, > > I've run into a problem changing the instance limit in Geronimo[0] and > while looking into that I wonder, isn't the default instance limit of > 10 for MDBs pretty arbitrary set? > > What are the consequences if the default is changed to 0 (unlimited)? If > I understand correctly, the prominent use case is ActiveMQ, and they > already > control the number of concurrent instances with the maxSessions parameter. > > I saw a previous discussion[1] a year ago that seems to end in nothing. If > there are no technical objections I'd like to open a jira issue for this. > > [0] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.geronimo.user/12800 > [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openejb.devel/7444 > > -- > Fredrik Jonson > >
