That might be, I hooked a break point to JtaEntityManager and it has never been 
reached.

Imho the creation of it should happen as soon as a persistence.xml is there, 
wdyt?

txs and LieGrue,
strub

--- David Blevins <[email protected]> schrieb am Do, 16.4.2009:

> Von: David Blevins <[email protected]>
> Betreff: Re: using OpenEJB in JUnit tests
> An: [email protected]
> Datum: Donnerstag, 16. April 2009, 5:15
> 
> On Apr 13, 2009, at 1:45 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> 
> > Hi David!
> > 
> >> Do you have any log output you could post?
> > I've attached a tee of the mvn test output and the
> surefire log.
> > 
> >> As a trivial implementation you could maybe just
> list the
> >> units under openejb/PersistenceUnit/, chop off the
> hash code
> > Thanks for pointing this again! I was not clear enough
> in my previous post: the problem is that there isn't any
> openejb/PersistenceUnit node at all - I only can find
> openejb/ejb.
> > 
> > I debuged through and found that the JtaEntityManager
> doesn't get initialised at all, because the
> JndiEncBuilder#build() doesn't get called but only the
> JndiBuilder#build(). So I have a few questions:
> > 1.) What is the difference between those 2?
> > 2.) How can I force the ContextFactory to call the
> JndiEncBuilder or does it make no sense at all?
> > 3.) Is this way to get the JtaEntityManager basically
> correct, or is there another way where we still can be sure
> that EJBs and WebBeans get the same JtaEntityManager
> instance?
> 
> Seems like as there are no actual references to the
> persistence unit in the app, we simply do not create the
> persistence unit.  Doesn't seem quite right, have to
> dig closer, but that's my current guess as to why nothing
> shows up.
> 
> -David
> 
> > 
> > 
> > --- David Blevins <[email protected]>
> schrieb am Mo, 13.4.2009:
> >> Von: David Blevins <[email protected]>
> >> Betreff: Re: using OpenEJB in JUnit tests
> >> An: [email protected]
> >> Datum: Montag, 13. April 2009, 0:40
> >> 
> >> On Apr 12, 2009, at 2:41 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> >> 
> >>> 
> >>> Hi!
> >>> 
> >>> Somehow this doesn't work.
> >>> 
> >>> If I startup OpenEJB like the examples do:
> >>> 
> >>>> Properties p = new Properties();
> >>>> p.put(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY,
> >>
> "org.apache.openejb.client.LocalInitialContextFactory");
> >>>> Context context = new InitialContext(p);
> >>> 
> >>> then no JtaEntityManager gets initialised.
> >>> 
> >>> Do I have to add additional properties?
> >>> 
> >>> persistence.xml and all other things should be
> in
> >> place.
> >>> 
> >>> The source is currently only in my git repo:
> >>> http://ns1.backwork.net/git/index.php?p=openwebbeans.git
> >> 
> >> Do you have any log output you could post?
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Regarding your question on IRC:
> >> 
> >> [13:32]
> >> <struberg>    hi david! fine to
> see you
> >> around :)
> >> [13:32]
> >> <struberg>    I have a little
> question
> >> concerning the OpenWebBeans/OpenEJB integration
> >> [13:32]
> >> <struberg>    I started the EJB
> >> container but cannot find my PersistenceUnit in
> the JNDI
> >> context
> >> [13:33]
> >> <struberg>    factory =
> >> (EntityManagerFactory)
> >> context.lookup("openejb/PersistenceUnit/" +
> unitName);
> >> [13:33]
> >> <struberg>    any ideas?
> >> 
> >> I mentioned this in the "obtaining the
> JtaEntityManager"
> >> thread:
> >> 
> >> On Mar 25, 2009, at 7:59 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> >> 
> >>> The tricky part of that is the unit names have
> a hash
> >> code on them to get around the issue that they
> aren't
> >> required to be unique outside the persistence.xml
> file and
> >> there can be multiple persistence.xml files in an
> app.
> >> As a trivial implementation you could maybe just
> list the
> >> units under openejb/PersistenceUnit/, chop off the
> hash code
> >> and use the first one with a matching name. 
> Supporting
> >> the case where the user has multiple units of the
> same name
> >> could be a feature to add later.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> The long and short of that is we don't use
> >> "openejb/PersistenceUnit/" + unitName as the JNDI
> name, so
> >> that won't work as is.
> >> 
> >> -David
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> >
> <TEST-org.apache.webbeans.test.geronimo.openejb.OpenEJBIntegrationTest.xml>
> 
> 



Reply via email to