mnour wrote: > > 15- Why not to make a more generic layer which OpenEJB can use so > people who like to use JDO APIs instead of JPA can do it seamlessly. > May be it is a stupid idea but I really would like to be able to > have that :D. >
Hum. I worked some month ago on a framework named Data Nucleus which is very interesting. But the work is huge because JPA and JDO are not similar (from my understanding). Jean-Louis -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Hot-deployment-and-datasources-tp24088169p24183936.html Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
