@Jean-Louis: A gentle reminder - You should not be pulling hairs out... men have issues with alopecia sooner or later anyway ;)
@All: Hope you and your family are well and the upcoming year 2010 looks bright to you :) All the best! Daniel On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > David wrote some posts a week ago related to the new EJB 3.1 specification. > > I'd like to know if there is a plan to go to EJB 3.1? > I mean, do we have a clear view of the gap between our implementation and > where we need/want to go? > I know that we already have a set of features implemented (at least > partially). > > I guess if we'll need to release a major version if we add EJB 3.1 features. > > What about all open issues? > IMHO, it would be nice to have a look to our JIRA and close not relevant > issues. Some of them has been fixed, some other have some patch file to > check and validate, etc ... > I gonna try to get some easy to fix issues and try to close them. > Some others are probably too hard for me;-) > That done, may be we should release the 3.1.3? > > Finally, Jacek did some tests and went ahead with OSGI. > I spent a couple of time pulling some hair out. After some small tests with > Karaf, i believe we can make it work in an OSGI environment. > But, i spoke some month ago with Guillaume NODET and another guy from > servicemix and if we want to make OpenEJB OSGI ready, it seems we will need > to refactor some pieces of code. Anyway, i'm convince Jacek have a far > better overview. > > I just wanted to point it out in order to check if we can manage OSGI with > EJB 3.1 tasks. > > It's definitely another topic we can discussed by the end of January with a > beer (and may be more ...) ;-) > > Men, Happy New Year!!! > I wish you (and your family) all the best. > > Kind regards, > Jean-Louis > -- > View this message in context: > http://n4.nabble.com/EJB-3-1-is-out-brainstorming-session-tp991512p991512.html > Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
