On Jan 26, 2010, at 8:09 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
Right, exactly. Was just going to post that. That prefix works just
fine. Or even just "amq4factory" and "amq5factory" or something.
Just as a side note, i would like to keep things working between
previous
version and the next one.
With that said openejb:broker should still work (IMHO).
Good thinking.
I started refactoring some small things around activemq to see how
it works.
We already have a module openejb-activemq to start a server. Don't
know if
it's still relevant.
Still used. Allows you to start an ActiveMQ broker rather than just
connect to one via the Resource Adapter.
I had in mind something like:
- openejb-activemq --> lastest activemq integration
- openejb-activemq4 --> oldest version
So IMO, the broker factory should go to those modules and disappear
from the
core.
Downside of that is we'd loose the ability to unit test MDBs in
openejb-core. The one class in server/openejb-activemq is very server-
specific and couldn't be moved into container/.
-David
