On Jun 1, 2010, at 1:48 PM, David Blevins wrote: > > On Jun 1, 2010, at 7:06 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > >> >> On May 27, 2010, at 5:03 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> >>> Author: dblevins >>> Date: Thu May 27 21:03:52 2010 >>> New Revision: 948999 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=948999&view=rev >>> Log: >>> svn merge -r 948242:948243 >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/trunk/openejb3 >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=948243&view=rev >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> r948243 | djencks | 2010-05-25 16:03:16 -0700 (Tue, 25 May 2010) | 1 line >>> >>> OPENEJB-1014 remove a lot of incorrect/misleading java: prefixes when >>> accessing local jndi rather than an initial context >> >> David, >> This is going to break Geronimo 2.2.x. The associated jndi changes that make >> this possible are only in Geronimo 3.0. So, we either need to revert to >> previous (admittedly faulty) functionality or do a fair amount of work to >> have Geronimo 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT behave properly. > > Side note, IMO, not supporting it is a failure.
I agree, we would be working around a long-standing bug in geronimo 2.2. I was really glad to fix it in trunk and then fix openejb. To fix it in geronimo, we need an InitialContextFactoryBuilder modeled on the aries one, but using gbeans instead of osgi services. This would only take an hour or two to write. However it may cause a fair amount of upheaval to get it properly installed and configured. I don't have a lot of time to spend on this right now, maybe I should try writing the ICFB and we can see how hard it is to get it to work. david jencks > >> >> Was there a strong motivation to merge this back into 3.1.x? > > No, was just trying to keep them in sync where possible. > > Are we seeing failures due to this? > > > -David >
