On Aug 19, 2010, at 4:50 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > > Hello guys, > > Just want to get your opinion about our jcdi branch. > > Is it still relevant to keep this branch? > The trunk is now fully Java EE 6 oriented. > I read some discussion (between David, Jacek, ...) about the next generation > of OpenEJB (Shall we base our code on CDI spec? Do we want to make it > OSGiable?....). > > Actually, each time we commit something in the trunk we try to merge those > changes in branches/openejb-3.1.x. Obviously, that's not the case for the > jcdi branch. > > So, is it just a kind of POC?
We need CDI support as part of EJB 3.1/Java EE 6. The branch is basically there to work out all the details on how the two integrate without destabilizing all the EJB 3.1 TCK work that is going on. Initially we had a ton of test failures and errors, but things are looking a bit better. I've tried to keep all the changes isolated so it shouldn't be too hard to move them over -- which will hopefully be soon. -David
