On May 5, 2010, at 2:29 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:27 AM, David Blevins <[email protected]>wrote: > >> With the @LocalBean support going in, we should maybe consider yanking >> @Local interfaces from all the examples across the board as really having to >> have an explicit business local interface is just EJB 3.0 noise.
We should definitely do this. As we should maybe make it so the default format for @LocalBean views is just plain 'Foo' rather than 'FooLocalBean'. Maybe a new 'interfaceType.' classification so that 'empty string' can be used in the format. Thoughts? (volunteers?) -David
