Opened a JIRA for the Hudson part of this note:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2998

On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:07 PM, David Blevins <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 17, 2010, at 12:30 AM, Andy wrote:
>
>> The question is, how happy are you for commiters (I guess I mean me, but 
>> also anyone interested) to try and clean up some of these issues in trunk? - 
>> Or would a pure Java 1.6 branch be the safer option, at least until wide 
>> ranging changes are tested by several devs on varying platforms.
>
> Changes of any kind are welcome.  Basic rule of thumb is to post a note to 
> the list and be open to changes.  You're doing both already, so great :)
>
>> I would like to put something as drastic as this in the top pom (which 
>> overrides the Apache 7 pom), and work down from there:
>>
>> <plugin>
>> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
>> <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
>> <version>2.3.2</version>
>> <configuration>
>> <source>1.6</source>
>> <target>1.6</target>
>> </configuration>
>> </plugin>
>>
>> I'd also like to ensure that all poms reference their parents throughout the 
>> project so that it is possible to pull up plugin and dependency definitions 
>> as high as possible.
>
> On this one just make sure to leave the examples untouched.  They are 
> intentionally not using any parent pom so that each one is a completely 
> self-contained example.
>
>> This cannot be done without builds initially failing until all issues are 
>> resolved - Issues meaning all the ones that arise on 'other' devs machines  
>> when everything seems fine on a local build ;-)
>
> On the note of things failing.  Would be great to get us setup in Hudson for 
> CI and publishing binaries:  https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/
>
> As far as I know it's a matter of filing a request here: 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA
>
>
> -David
>
> PS  Careful of "thread hijacking" (starting new threads by replying to an 
> unrelated email).  It makes things look like one big discussion in email 
> clients that support threading and most the online archives like Nabble ( 
> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/OpenEJB-Dev-f982480.html )
>
>

Reply via email to