Sure I can do the same for Geronimo and as it looks like by reading Marius' reply, it shouldn't be much of a hassle.
Cheers Daniel On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 1:07 AM, David Jencks <[email protected]> wrote: > about the hudson maven support and why you don't want to use it :-) > > I think that the built-in support first builds the maven project and then if > it succeeds copies the snapshots to the deployment location. This is a no-no > because the resulting snapshots aren't timestamped. If you use mvn clean > deploy then you will get properly timestamped snapshots. The disadvantage is > that the modules that build OK before a failure will get deployed. After > thinking about this for a few months I've decided this is generally not a big > problem :-) > > is there any chance I could talk you into setting up geronimo for > hudson/hudson for geronimo after you've learned how to do it? > > thanks > david jencks > > On Sep 24, 2010, at 1:50 PM, dsh wrote: > >> Okay so I'll do the research as soon as I have some spare cycles. >> >> Cheers >> Daniel >> >> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:35 PM, David Blevins <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Sep 24, 2010, at 11:48 AM, dsh wrote: >>> >>>> So what do we need to do to get the Hudson build for OpenEJB up and >>>> running. I am still a little confused about what the missing pieces >>>> are and what to do next... >>> >>> Don't know anything about hudson either. Goal is to have OpenEJB build and >>> publish snapshots to nexus. I know other projects do it, don't know how. >>> >>> -David >>> >>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:41 PM, David Blevins <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Added you to the right unix group. >>>>> >>>>> Saw a presentation by Jason on Maven 3 and he mentioned in that session >>>>> that they don't use the maven specific support in Hudson. Seemed to >>>>> indicate that instead they use a plain java project. Not sure on any >>>>> other details, but heads up. >>>>> >>>>> -David >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sep 21, 2010, at 4:32 AM, dsh wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> FYI >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>>>> From: Niklas Gustavsson (JIRA) <[email protected]> >>>>>> Date: Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:22 PM >>>>>> Subject: [jira] Closed: (INFRA-2998) Setup Hudson CI Build for Apache >>>>>> OpenEJB >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> [ >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel >>>>>> ] >>>>>> >>>>>> Niklas Gustavsson closed INFRA-2998. >>>>>> ------------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> Assignee: Niklas Gustavsson >>>>>> Resolution: Won't Fix >>>>>> >>>>>> The OpenEJB PMC chair can set up the necessary access as described here: >>>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson#How_do_I_get_an_account >>>>>> >>>>>> If you need any help from infra, e.g. installing any dependencies that >>>>>> are not already available, feel free to open a new issue. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Setup Hudson CI Build for Apache OpenEJB >>>>>>> ---------------------------------------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Key: INFRA-2998 >>>>>>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2998 >>>>>>> Project: Infrastructure >>>>>>> Issue Type: Task >>>>>>> Security Level: public(Regular issues) >>>>>>> Components: Hudson >>>>>>> Reporter: Daniel S. Haischt >>>>>>> Assignee: Niklas Gustavsson >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On the note of things failing. Would be great to get us setup in >>>>>>> Hudson for CI and publishing binaries: >>>>>>> https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/ >>>>>>> I'd offer to volunteer on this task if necessary. >>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>> Daniel >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >>>>>> - >>>>>> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> > >
