Why do you think 2 month is unreasonable. For sure the release contents would be far less compared to what we now had in the 3.1.3 release, but in the other hand Scrum does 1 month timeboxes at max. and it works too. Or do you think we won't have anything going into every two months release contents and thus we need a greater timebox?
Cheers Daniel On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Jeremy Whitlock <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Oct 20, 2010, at 3:23 PM, David Blevins wrote: > >> Yikes, it was one year and 6 days since our last 3.1.x release. Hadn't >> realized it was so bad :) > > It's called life. Don't beat yourself up. ;) > >> Maybe we should try time-boxed releases for a while? I think CXF does 2 >> months. > > > I love the idea but I wonder if 2 months is unreasonable. I'd suggest 3 at > minimum and work backwards as premature releases occur. > > Take care, > > Jeremy Whitlock <[email protected]> > Twitter: jcscoobyrs > Website: http://www.thoughtspark.org > > > >
