On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:59 PM, David Blevins <[email protected]> wrote: > Based on how much we had in that 3.1.3 release it probably should have been > called 3.2 ... and probably our 3.2 should be called 4 since it jumps both > Java and Java EE versions (5 to 6). > > Too late to rename 3.1.3 to something more sensible, but maybe we should > change trunk. > > Thoughts?
Remember when we talked it over and decided that ejb 3.0 -> openejb 3.0.x and ejb 3.1 -> openejb 3.1.x? I'd stick with the versioning until ejb3.1 is fully supported by openejb with its numbering bumped to 4.0. Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski Notatnik Projektanta Java EE - http://jaceklaskowski.pl Komitet organizacyjny warsjawa 2010 - http://warsjawa.pl
