+1 Jeff
On Nov 17, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: > Looks good to me. +1 > > Checked signature/checksum, source, and build -- all looked good. > > --kevan > > On Nov 12, 2010, at 11:19 PM, David Blevins wrote: > >> Oooo-kaaay. Thanks everyone so much for the patience. Here we have >> another set of binaries that can actually compile and run in Java 5 :) >> >> Third time's the charm! >> >> Release notes: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/staging-3.1.4-vote3/3.1.4/RELEASE-NOTES.txt >> >> Repo: >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-068/ >> >> Binaries: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/staging-3.1.4-vote3/ >> >> Branch (to become a tag): >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/branches/openejb-3.1.4/ >> >> Rat log: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/staging-3.1.4-vote3/rat.log >> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/staging-3.1.4-vote3/rat.xml (ant >> script with excludes) >> >> iTests results so far: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/staging-3.1.4-vote3/build.xml >> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/staging-3.1.4-vote3/winxp-jdk15.txt >> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/staging-3.1.4-vote3/winxp-jdk16.txt >> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/staging-3.1.4-vote3/osx-jdk16.txt >> >> If someone can capture the output of JDK 1.6 and 1.5 on Linux and >> upload it somewhere, that'd be wonderful. If anyone has an OSX >> machine with an actual JDK 1.5 on it and can do that, super! >> >> Here's my +1 >> >> -David >
