On a side note, Thiago and Andy, you guys should file NDAs as well so that you can at least see the TCK reports and know what the status is:
Just need to sign/fax or email ([email protected]) this NDA: http://www.apache.org/jcp/ApacheNDA.pdf -David On Feb 14, 2011, at 9:29 AM, David Blevins wrote: > > On Feb 14, 2011, at 12:14 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > >> >> Hi David, >> >> I'm very interested on that topic as I cannot find anyway to run tck on >> geronimo :-( >> I did a lot of changes some weeks ago on the DeploymentLoader .... >> It was working fine on all examples, itests ... but Geronimo tck were not >> happy! >> >> So I'd like to go ahead with that work but need a way to check everything. >> Actually, i was not register to the tck list. I guess it's ok now. >> >> Could you please send your post again please? > > No worries. You should be on the list now. Stephen, your request went > through as well. > > Side note, the perms for the openejb-tck repo were messed up and copied > straight from the Geronimo setup. So only Geronimo committers had write > access. I cleaned things up so now there's just one permission group with > read/write access for anyone with an nda who wants to help. So far that's > just the OpenEJB committers with NDAs and Stephen who has an NDA and > requested access. > > There's only 6 java files and 11 groovy files in the entire tck setup. > Dividing up permissions on such a small chunk of never-released code seems > like overkill. So few people are going to actually help with the TCK anyway. > > If we want to be more strict though and require patches be posted a > non-public jira project, that can easily be arranged. > > > -David >
