On it! It is a long way though... just got home and I'm downloading 3.1.4, and then I will start to investigate it... ;O) Any help on what should be changed is welcome. []s, Thiago.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:02 PM, David Blevins <[email protected]>wrote: > On Mar 1, 2011, at 10:07 PM, David Blevins wrote: > > > How hard would it be to create a version of 3.1.4 that supports JPA 2.0 > and would anyone be interested doing that? > > This got turned into an "a or b" discussion and I really meant it as an "a > and b". > > Let me try and rephrase. Absolutely we need to get some form of 3.2 out > the door -- alpha probably. Currently the Tomcat code is broken and there's > a lot of fluctuation in the OWB integration. We can absolutely double-down > and try twice as hard to get 3.2 working enough to release in any form. I > plan to spend all of my personal time doing just that as I have to speak on > it in April at JAX London before our get-together. Needless to say, I'm > probably not going to get much sleep this month :) > > So that said, it isn't mutually exclusive with the idea of taking the code > from 3.1.4, adding in the JPA 2.0 support, and releasing it as a completely > stable OpenEJB version X. If anyone had time to work on that, I would be > very supportive. It certainly would be a release with significant value. > Were we to do that, we'd probably have to bump our version numbers ahead. > Trunk to 4.0 and this new branch to 3.2. I've often wondered if we > shouldn't be calling trunk 4.0 anyway. > > > Any volunteers? > > > I see one already. If we can get one or two more, we could probably pull > it off. > > > > -David > >
