+1

Would be great to add CI at least for the trunk and the 3.1.x branch

Jean-Louis

2011/3/4 Jonathan Gallimore <[email protected]>

> +1. I was wondering what happened to buildbot...
>
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 1:00 PM, dsh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > We should get our CI system up and running again no? I mean why should
> > a dev run the build manually to validate that it isn't broken if this
> > can be done by a machine over night?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Daniel
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Jonathan Gallimore
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I did a full build last night with all the tests (not the itests
> though)
> > and
> > > it built ok with all the tests passing - I always do this before
> > committing.
> > >
> > > I have seen some compile issues around OpenWebBeans recently when
> > somethings
> > > been updated on that side, and I end up wishing I hadn't taken an
> update.
> > My
> > > hope is that will settle down in time - I've not looked too in depth,
> but
> > I
> > > guess we're building against a snapshot version at the moment.
> > >
> > > What's the issue you're seeing? I guess you're updating CXF to a newer
> > > version? If I can help then I'm more than happy to.
> > >
> > > Jon
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Jacek Laskowski <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I more and more am leaning towards calling it "to hate it" when I
> > >> somehow touch the latest snapshots of our deps and I have to deal with
> > >> the latest changes that don't even compile or once it's taken over
> > >> pass the tests. It punched me again.
> > >>
> > >> Does OpenEJB build for you? It's again when openejb-core fails and I
> > >> can't spend a dime on it (being swamped with openejb-cxf and
> > >> relatives).
> > >>
> > >> Jacek
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Jacek Laskowski
> > >> Java EE, functional languages and IBM WebSphere -
> http://blog.japila.pl
> > >> Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura 2011 (dawniej Javarsovia).
> > >> http://confitura.pl
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to