Hi, This jar starts 3 threads: hsqldb, openejb and jetty. No server knows about the existence of the others. The communication is done "remotely"... so the Openejb server is running in a stand-alone way.
[]s, Thiago. On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>wrote: > works for me. > > just for my information, can you give some technical information about this > jar: how did you do the packaging? you use jetty with openejb, does it > really work? > > Thanks for your work > > Romain > > 2011/4/14 Thiago Veronezi <[email protected]> > > > Hi devs, > > This is the second try.. :O) I did some changes on this project and did > > some > > basic tests on tomcat. Could you check if is everything ok? > > > > The real tests I did are here... > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/embedded-server.jar > > This is a "proof of concept" I am working on for new clients... and guess > > what: I am using OpenEJB.3.2/JPA2 :O) > > To run it execute "java -jar embedded-server.jar" and wait for the > message > > "Your server is up and running", then open https://localhost:8443/ > > > > user: "root" > > password: "1234" > > > > thanks, > > Thiago. > > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:14 PM, David Blevins <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > Hey Thiago > > > > > > This is wonderful stuff! I'm pretty impressed with your follow-though. > > No > > > pun intended, but talk about persistence :) > > > > > > The only other important thing I can think of is to make the assembly > > names > > > match trunk. Specifically > > > > > > openejb-3.2.zip -> apache-openejb-3.2.zip > > > tomee-6.123412341 -> apache-tomee-3.2.zip > > > > > > I can't remember what name/version we gave TomEE exactly, but we should > > fix > > > it up like it is in trunk. > > > > > > Go ahead and push snapshots now. Once the renaming is done, I think we > > can > > > ship this thing! > > > > > > Pretty exciting! > > > > > > > > > -David > > > > > > > > > On Apr 5, 2011, at 6:26 PM, Thiago Veronezi wrote: > > > > > > > The problem with OpenJPA is solved. It was an "user issue" :O) ... > > > > missing javaagent plugin. > > > > []s, > > > > Thiago. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:20 AM, Thiago Veronezi <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Dear devs, > > > >> I've spent the last days using the 3.2.0-shapshot version on a > > > >> test environment and it seems ok. I didn't see any problem on the > > > Openejb > > > >> side. I am facing a problem with Openjpa but it could be an "user > > > problem" > > > >> though. :O) Ill forward a question to the openjpa list about it. > > > >> > > > >> Could you check if everything is really ok or if I am missing > > something > > > you > > > >> think we could add to this version? > > > >> > > > >> []s, > > > >> Thiago. > > > >> > > > >> OT.: I'm still not convinced about the Criteria API over the old > ejbql > > > way. > > > >> :O) > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Thiago Veronezi < > [email protected] > > > >wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Hi David, > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>>> Excellent progress! > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Let me know when you think it might be a good time to push > snapshots > > > and > > > >>>> I'll get it hooked up into buildbot. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I've committed my last changes... but this is not a good time to > set > > > up > > > >>> the CI for it. I still have some problems with the unit tests. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>>> Maybe we could even roll the version numbers this weekend. > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >>>> -David > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I'm OK with that. Feel free to go ahead with the version number > > > changes. > > > >>> > > > >>> []s, > > > >>> Thiago. > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
