Shawn, Ivan, Checked it out a bit and that change is pretty necessary given the other changes. More interested in David's changes actually, but we can deal with that later.
Commit away! :) -David On Apr 27, 2011, at 10:03 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote: > Thanks ! I just sent a mail to tck list to add more details on the failed > tck case. > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:33 PM, David Blevins > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Thanks, Shawn for the notes and patch on OPENEJB-1531. If you could post >> to any of the tck lists one or more of the affected tests, that would be >> excellent. >> >> David Jencks, if you could be persuaded to remember which TCK tests were >> affected by OPENEJB-1328 and what lead to that fix, that would be great too. >> We didn't have any problems with .equals and getInvokedBusinessInterface in >> the Java EE 5 tck, so it would be great to know what drove the extra >> complexity. >> >> >> -David >> >> > > > -- > Shawn
