I would say Yes to the OPENEJBx4 documentation base On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 7:09 PM, David Blevins <[email protected]>wrote:
> > On May 24, 2011, at 3:48 PM, Karan Malhi wrote: > > > Hi , > > > > Would like to clean up our website a bit and identify links/pages with > > stale/incorrect content. If you have ideas for content which would make > our > > site more useful, please do come forward and share them on this thread. > Not > > sure how we should approach this collaboratively, but the easiest is that > if > > you find something which is wrong, stale or poorly organised, either fix > it, > > or simply identify it and share it on this thread if you do not have time > to > > fix it. Somebody can probably pick it up and fix it. > > > > You could share the page in the following format: > > [url] :- Issue > > > > For example, > > [https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENEJB/News ] :- News is > > stale, I am not sure how to update it, can somebody look into it > > > > Looking forward to some interesting ideas :) > > Such an excellent initiative. > > Don't have time to list all the example pages individually, but they need > some love. They took a hit when I was feverishly updating all our examples > to show the most current APIs right before speaking at JAX London -- like > literally the night before speaking.. was up till like 3am. > > All the snippet links are bad. Updating them raises a question.... > > > Do we need an OPENEJBx4 documentation base? > > > The short answer is likely "yes and it will be a pain in the butt" :) > > > -David > > -- Karan Singh Malhi
