Yes that's true, but actually it's also the case that lots of TCks are full of errors, invalid assumptions which only works on the RI, non-portable behaviour, etc :)
LieGrue, strub --- On Mon, 6/13/11, David Blevins <[email protected]> wrote: > From: David Blevins <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Examples - CDI > To: [email protected] > Date: Monday, June 13, 2011, 5:16 AM > > On Jun 12, 2011, at 10:01 PM, David Blevins wrote: > > > We tried this for a very short time in the early days > of Geronimo till we were reminded that it was explicitly > against the TCK agreement to ship a certified server in "non > compliant" mode by default. > > To be clearer, compliance as defined by the TCK not the > spec. If there were no tests we could easily disable > something -- or never implement it. > > -David > >
