My mistake, I should've been specific about the issue I was talking
about. However, that mistake gave us some great explanation about the
code you submitted as part of the patch for issue OPENEJB-1625. :)

Yes, I am kinda stuck too, going through documentation to set it up slowly.

On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Hao Lieu <[email protected]> wrote:
> Oh, you were referring to
>
> [OPENEJB-1579] Setup CDI TCK for TomEE
>
> Yeah, i kinda got stuck on that also, so i went with a simpler example to
> get started.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Hao Lieu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Karan,
>>
>> OPENEJB-1590 has been changed to OPENEJB-1625
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1625>
>> jira/browse/OPENEJB-1625<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1625>
>>
>> I submitted a patch last night. The patch is an attachment to the JIRA.
>> I think you'll be able to figure out by looking though the patch.
>>
>> you'll need 2 classes A and B, where b is a member of A, and A I made a
>> stateless.
>> The member b is annotated with @Injected.
>> B has a callback method annotated with @PostConstruct, does some
>> initialization.
>>
>> I think the only tricky part is the sauce that binds it all,
>> you'll also need a resources/META-INF/beans.xml to activate the CDI,
>> otherwise the injection won't happen, and during runtime,
>> you'll get an error about not being able to locate some of the resources.
>>
>> Then a simple test class. I had an @EJB reference to A that the container
>> injects, and I just retrieved A.b.getX() to make sure that X was
>> initialized
>> properly in the callback method.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Karan Malhi <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Hao Lieu,
>>>
>>> I was just taking a look at this JIRA issue. Was wondering if you have
>>> had the time to take a look at it. If you have any notes/code to
>>> share, feel free to submit a patch.
>>> BTW, you could also jump on the IRC list #openejb @ freenode and we
>>> can collaborate there too. Its a nice way to instantly bounce ideas
>>> off of other members, although an email in the list is still the best
>>> way. Meanwhile, I will try and see if I could try and understand what
>>> is needed to setup .
>>>
>>> Thank you!
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Hao Lieu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > i'm going to take a look into
>>> >
>>> >   [OPENEJB-1579] Setup CDI TCK for TomEE
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:06 PM, David Blevins <[email protected]
>>> >wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> If anyone is looking for some challenging and hard work.  Still some
>>> >> critical CDI work to be done.
>>> >>
>>> >>    [OPENEJB-1205] Expose Stateful remove method from proxy for Scope
>>> >> management
>>> >>    [OPENEJB-1579] Setup CDI TCK for TomEE
>>> >>    [OPENEJB-1581] InjectionTarget replacement for EJBs
>>> >>    [OPENEJB-1582] @Inject javax.validation.Validator built-in bean
>>> >>    [OPENEJB-1583] @Inject javax.validation.ValidatorFactory built-in
>>> bean
>>> >>    [OPENEJB-1584] @Inject Instance<java.security.Principal> built-in
>>> bean
>>> >>    [OPENEJB-1587] @Remote disabled for @Stateful beans in a non
>>> @Dependent
>>> >> scope
>>> >>    [OPENEJB-1588] @Interceptors invoked before @InterceptorBinding
>>> >> interceptors
>>> >>    [OPENEJB-1590] @PostConstruct called after @Inject
>>> >>    [OPENEJB-1591] @Inject called after @Resource, @EJB,
>>> @PersistenceContext
>>> >> and @PersistenceUnit
>>> >>    [OPENEJB-1592] @Inject support for @WebService beans
>>> >>    [OPENEJB-1593] SessionBean @Specializes
>>> >>    [OPENEJB-1594] SessionBeans as @New beans
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Most the above have a set of failing TCK tests that relate.  Those can
>>> be
>>> >> run with the 'failed.xml' testng file in the tck/cdi-embedded/ module.
>>>  If
>>> >> you have that module in your IDE you can actually just open the
>>> failed.xml
>>> >> file and click 'run' like a regular unit test.  The classes are listed
>>> >> individually to make commenting them out and running just one easier.
>>> >>
>>> >> -David
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > H
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Karan Singh Malhi
>>> twitter.com/KaranSinghMalhi
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> H
>>
>
>
>
> --
> H
>



-- 

Karan Singh Malhi
twitter.com/KaranSinghMalhi

Reply via email to