Anyway, let's start to do this and figure how rough the trunk is step by
step.  the first step would be to clean the snapshot depencencies up:

<xbeanVersion>3.8-SNAPSHOT</xbeanVersion>
<org.apache.openwebbeans.version>1.1.1-SNAPSHOT</org.apache.openwebbeans.version>
<geronimo.connector.version>3.1.1-SNAPSHOT</geronimo.connector.version>


There are also some internal compoents that are using different version then
4.0.0-SNAPSHOT.

<javaee-api.version>6.0-SNAPSHOT</javaee-api.version>

some samples in trunk are using 1.1-SNAPSHOT,  But I  can find part of them
are still 1.0-SNAPSHOT.

I'm not sure what's the pratice to release javaee-api and samples when they
don't share the same version with trunk.








On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:58 PM, David Blevins <[email protected]>wrote:

> I suspect that even if we get started now, it will still be a few weeks
> before we see anything.  It's been over a year on trunk with no release.
>  It's going to be rough.
>
> Best case scenario, we get two releases out before October.  Worst case
> scenario, we wait too long to start and don't get any.
>
> -David
>
> On Aug 25, 2011, at 10:49 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
>
> > Don't know if geronimo can wait until javaone.   We could release a
> openejb
> > m1/beta1, and then release a m2/beta2 for javaone.
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> >> maybe we should wait just before javaone?
> >>
> >> - Romain
> >>
> >> 2011/8/26 Shawn Jiang <[email protected]>
> >>
> >>> Geronimo is going to make a beta release.    Let's discuss a openejb
> >> trunk
> >>> release again.
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:00 AM, David Blevins <
> [email protected]
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Would be excellent if we could get a beta ready before this
> >> presentation
> >>> on
> >>>> the 25th:
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.oscon.com/oscon2011/public/schedule/detail/20105
> >>>>
> >>>> Might be kind of tight, but ideally there would be at least something
> >>> there
> >>>> for people to download and play with.
> >>>>
> >>>> -David
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Shawn
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Shawn
>
>


-- 
Shawn

Reply via email to