On Sep 14, 2011, at 11:42 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > Did not see any results. > Is the vote close?
Was hoping to get a vote from David Jencks. I know he's been flying around this week, but maybe we'll get lucky tomorrow. :) Ideally, anyone who gave a non +1 vote would vote again after the concerns were addressed. -David > > 2011/9/13 Jonathan Gallimore <[email protected]> > >> +1 >> >> Just one thing I spotted, the LICENSE/NOTICE files in the *-sources jars >> that I built from the tag didn't match up with the ones in the repository. >> The jars in the repository all look ok to me though, and the binaries I >> built from the tag match up ok. >> >> Jon >> >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected] >>> wrote: >> >>> +1 Looks good to me. >>> >>> sig/checksum, license/notice, rat, build, jars... >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Alan >>> On Sep 7, 2011, at 2:09 AM, David Blevins wrote: >>> >>>> The staging repo & binaries: >>>> >>>> >>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-043/org/apache/openejb/javaee-api/6.0-1/ >>>> >>>> Tag: >>>> >>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/javaee-api-6.0-1 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -David >>>> >>> >>> >>
