Doh... but not PMC... but I didnt see my name...

Jeff

On Oct 26, 2011, at 7:38 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:

> and I threw in a +1 too, eh?  ;-)
> 
> Jeff
> 
> On Oct 26, 2011, at 7:29 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> 
>> New I forgot something :)
>> 
>> Throw me in for a +1
>> 
>> So, small hitch.  We need to hold this vote open for at least one more PMC 
>> vote.  With my vote, we only have 2.
>> 
>> Here's the list of people we need to persuade to provide some legal 
>> oversight:
>> 
>> adc
>> dain
>> dblevins
>> djencks
>> jgallimore
>> jlaskowski
>> jlmonteiro
>> kevan
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -David
>> 
>> On Oct 26, 2011, at 5:35 PM, Ivan wrote:
>> 
>>> The OpenEJB 3.0.4 vote passed with the following votes
>>> +1 Jacek Laskowski, Karan Malhi, Jeff Genender, Daniel, Romain Manni-Bucau,
>>> Ivan
>>> +0 AndyG, Mohammad Nour El-Din
>>> no -1
>>> Thanks, everyone, I will promote the artifacts soon.
>>> 
>>> 2011/10/27 Ivan <[email protected]>
>>> 
>>>> close the vote, and will send a result email later, thanks !
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 2011/10/26 Ivan <[email protected]>
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi, if no other issue, I will close the vote tomorrow.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2011/10/25 Ivan <[email protected]>
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi, Mark, source code packages are the artefacts we vote for, :-)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> vote artifacts :
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-090/org/apache/openejb/openejb/3.0.4/openejb-3.0.4.tar.gz
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-090/org/apache/openejb/openejb/3.0.4/openejb-3.0.4.zip
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 2011/10/25 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Where can I find the sources.zip?
>>>>>>> This usually gets created via a task defined in apache-parent.pom
>>>>>>> It should be somewhere in the staging repo, but I couldn't find it.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>> From: David Blevins <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>>> Cc:
>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 3:19 AM
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (3rd Try)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Just ran my little report.  Haven't checked out the results yet too
>>>>>>> much:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/orgapacheopenejb-090/archives.html
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Oct 22, 2011, at 9:27 AM, Ivan wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>  Let's vote for Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4, this release is mostly for
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> incoming Geronimo 2.1.8.
>>>>>>>>>  Comparing with the last version, only two JIRAs are included :
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>  OPENEJB-1091: Cause of RollbackException swallowed
>>>>>>>>>  OPENEJB-1258 Boolean conversion problem in ejb-jar.xml
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>  binary repository  :
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-090
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>  source codes :
>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0
>>>>>>>>> .4
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>  vote artifacts :
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-090/org/apache/openejb/openejb/3.0.4/openejb-3.0.4.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-090/org/apache/openejb/openejb/3.0.4/openejb-3.0.4.zip
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>  I used the David's legal tool to scan the artifacts in the
>>>>>>> staging
>>>>>>>>> repository, the report looks fine to me :
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>  http://people.apache.org/~xuhaihong/report/archives.html
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>   Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>   [ ] +1  approve
>>>>>>>>>   [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>>>>>>>   [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Ivan
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Ivan
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ivan
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Ivan
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Ivan
>> 
> 

Reply via email to