+1 - Romain
2011/11/8 David Blevins <[email protected]> > > On Nov 8, 2011, at 5:53 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > > there are already several classes we could want to extract > > > > what i don't like with this ejb is it will be exposed to user since it is > > loggued and not usable by him > > Maybe we need to write in some sort of "hidden" flag and corresponding > @Hidden annotation for some of the EJBs we produce. > > Other ones that come to mind are: > - the managedbean we create for testcases > - the managedbean we create for the class that bootstrapped the > EJBContainer > - the "Comp" managedbean we use to hold shared "java:comp/env" names > > Seems like the real pattern is that we're finding it more and more useful > to create EJBs ourselves. Some way to do that without bugging users could > be nice. > > > -David > >
