it is not explicitly checked i think (only the format is checked). probably to be compatible when possible.
- Romain 2011/12/5 Mohammad Nour El-Din <[email protected]> > Also another thing, client code should be checked for whether it checks for > that specific version or not ? > > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Jacek Laskowski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > should we have a 4.0 compatible with 3.1? > > > > Why not provided there's some code incompatibilities. I consider both > > versions different. > > > > Jacek > > > > -- > > Jacek Laskowski > > Java EE, functional languages and IBM WebSphere - http://blog.japila.pl > > Warszawa JUG conference = Confitura (formerly Javarsovia) :: > > http://confitura.pl > > "Hoping to save time by spending it" by David Blevins (Apache OpenEJB) > > > > > > -- > Thanks > - Mohammad Nour > ---- > "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" > - Albert Einstein >
