Hehe. Well, it'll be very late tonight before I'll get the chance to hack again. I can port that fix over to the branch, or if someone wants to be beat me to it I can spend that time rolling the new release binaries instead.
Either way, we're looking very good thanks to everyone who has stepped up. It's been quite fun to see all the group activity. -David On Jan 12, 2012, at 2:54 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > he got me too ;) > > - Romain > > > 2012/1/12 AndyG <[email protected]> > >> Had a similar fix in the pipes here, was just not quick enough on the >> check-in. However, just for info, I have had to bump up a few build >> environment options on Windows to get a full build to complete: >> >> set MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx768m -XX:MaxPermSize=256M -XX:ReservedCodeCacheSize=64m >> -Xss4096k >> >> >> The stack size option -Xss4096k is probably overkill, but he default of >> 1024k is just not enough to recurs through the file system for some of the >> assembly items - The issue being a StackOverflow Exception thrown by the >> runtime because it hits the limit. >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-OpenEJB-4-0-0-beta-2-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2-tp4274468p4288576.html >> Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>
