Historical reasons, quite sure.
+1 as well

2012/2/6 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>

> No objection for me (even a +1 ;))
>
> - Romain
>
> Le 6 févr. 2012 03:45, "Alan D. Cabrera" <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
> > Any objections if I clean up as I encounter?
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alan
> >
> > On Feb 5, 2012, at 12:14 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> >
> > > historical reason i guess :p
> > >
> > > a lot of test uses @Test and @RunWith but they are more recent ;)
> > >
> > > - Romain
> > >
> > >
> > > 2012/2/5 Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]>
> > >
> > >> Just curious.  Why do our tests extend TestCase instead of using
> > >> annotations?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Alan
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to