>> Of course I made the mistake of trying it in tomee-webprofile where it
will not work :)
>>JAX-RS is going to be added to the Web Profile in Java EE 7, so it should
work itself out eventually.
>>Unrelated note, we might try and find a way to strip down the JAX-RS
support so we can include it in TomEE Web Profile without increasing the
footprint too much.

Hi David,
Thanks for the warning. I will use a regular servlet to generate the json
strings.

[]s,
Thiago.

On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 6:35 PM, David Blevins <[email protected]>wrote:

> It's looking pretty great so far!!
>
> Of course I made the mistake of trying it in tomee-webprofile where it
> will not work :)  JAX-RS is going to be added to the Web Profile in Java EE
> 7, so it should work itself out eventually.  Unrelated note, we might try
> and find a way to strip down the JAX-RS support so we can include it in
> TomEE Web Profile without increasing the footprint too much.
>
> Feature requests I would have might be:
>
>  - Show ContainerInfo data
>  - Show ResourceInfo data
>  - Show AppInfo data
>
>
> -David
>
> On Feb 16, 2012, at 8:14 AM, Thiago Veronezi wrote:
>
> > Nice catch! Thanks Romain!
> >
> > []s,
> > Thiago.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> >> I like the cod you added (in particular the js ;))
> >>
> >> The only warning i have about JAXRS is we should just check our
> context.xml
> >> to prevent access from something else than localhost is still working
> with
> >> it otherwise it can be a big security issue.
> >>
> >> But good job Thiago!
> >>
> >> - Romain
> >>
> >>
> >> 2012/2/16 Thiago Veronezi <[email protected]>
> >>
> >>> Guys,
> >>>
> >>> I am working on the
> >>> TOMEE-130<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-130> task.
> >>> Please code review the java code I implemented for this new interface.
> >>> The intent of JndiWs is to provide a json string with all lookup string
> >> one
> >>> can access. Is that a good approach?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Thiago.
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to